248
that it appeared impossible that the
applied to
Chinese passenger Act was them; His Excellency avill however be
Au a
better position than myself to
Know whether the Act is
such vessels or not
apyrlied
li
3. The next paragraph of your letter refers to augervision, which I consider defective, and which opinion
case,
Dhar
I illustrate by a particular for certain emigration, ports and ships
preferred, is owing to the restrictions of the Chinese Passenger Act
not British are
i
respect
le
opace, provisions and other
protections during the voyage. But the
substance of my
•crumunication to the
Puigration Board, is the view that for
the
engagement of emigrants
under
contract of labor, strict surveillance
should be maintained before the
Ov
is in
any
MMÄLUM
emigrant embarks bound to unbark. It is this previous
not
percision, the supervision in the matter of collecting and engaging, in the precautions for health and comfort during the voyage, that I consider defective. I have scarcely said that "malpradices" have resulted, but whend
it is borne in mind that in the woof
Kiduajiing days in China, a supervisira somewhat similar to that required by
the Chinese Passenger Act, was maintained
and how ineffectual it proved,
other
to be necessary;
supervision would appear to be n
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.